AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |
Back to Blog
Break room signs11/21/2023 He is also seeking answers about the courthouse protocol for jurors and whether they’re permitted to go outside for breaks during deliberation.ĭuring Wednesday’s hearing, Navarro’s attorneys sharply questioned Torres’ description of events. Navarro, who at times grew visibly frustrated during the questioning of the court security officer, is seeking anyone outside the courthouse who might have captured video or photos of the jury’s excursion to gauge just how substantially they were exposed to the protesters. ![]() 6 violence, particularly in its closing argument just before the jury began deliberating, could bear on the potential influence any signs had on the jury. Navarro said prosecutors’ decision to link Navarro’s case to the Jan. “I want to know what happened and how it happened,” Navarro said. 6 might have had more meaning to the jury in his case. By linking his contempt of Congress trial to the attack, Navarro said, protesters wielding signs related to Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol, describing Congress’ efforts to investigate the causes of the violence that day and Navarro’s refusal to cooperate. Navarro, speaking to reporters Wednesday, emphasized that prosecutors strongly linked the charges against him to the Jan. Ultimately, Mehta ruled that Navarro had failed to show Trump asserted the privilege and could not claim it as a defense. 6 committee by asserting executive privilege. Navarro’s brief trial belied the complex two-year pretrial debate about whether Trump had attempted to shield Navarro from complying with the Jan. ![]() The House held Navarro in contempt of Congress in April 2022 and the Justice Department charged him with two counts of contempt of Congress two months later. They testified that Navarro refused to appear for a deposition or provide any documents to their investigators despite a valid subpoena. Navarro was convicted after a two-day trial that featured testimony from three former employees of the Jan. Mehta’s task is to determine not only whether the jurors saw any protesters - a common sight outside of the federal courthouse in Washington - but whether any exposure could have meaningfully influenced their decision. After they returned to the jury room, Torres recalled, the jury reached a verdict within about 30 minutes, concluding a roughly four-hour deliberation. Outside the building, Torres said, the jurors spent about 10 to 15 minutes chatting among themselves and were not approached by anyone.
0 Comments
Read More
Leave a Reply. |